Ballistic missile attacks can come in many forms. One might prefer to think of war in the modern age as “unthinkable,” but it would be irresponsible to dismiss the harm enemies may wish us. With both textual descriptions and animations, “scenarios” shows what both attacks and interceptions would look like.
»»
"I often remind people that a ballistic missile attack using a weapon of mass destruction from a rogue state is every bit as much a threat to our borders now as a Warsaw Pact tank was two decades ago."
--- Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary of State, December 8, 1998
Citing the recent Perry-Schlesinger Commission report on the strategic posture of the U.S. (published in May), they warn that America's nuclear force is in desperate need of funding, upgrading, and maintenance if we are to avoid unilateral disarmament by unilateral obsolescence.
Among other things, they recommend a rejection of Russia's continuing effort to link mutual arms reductions to the abandonment of U.S. missile defenses.
» Strategic Posture Report 2009 - Full Text
» Final Report on America's Strategic Posture
The satellites will add a layer to the surveillance component of the U.S. BMD system by providing the Missile Defense Agency with its first space-based missile-tracking capabilities; currently the MDA is better at tracking the launch and terminal phases of ballistic missiles than it is at tracking mid-course flight.
The scheduled launch follows a May MDA launch of a separate classified STSS demonstration satellite. The two additional satellites slated for launch later this year were originally part of a program called the Flight Demonstration System, which was cancelled in 1999. The satellites were revived in 2002 when the MDA awarded $868 million to Northrop Grumman to prepare the satellites to go into orbit.
The Air Force has plans for a six-month testing period, during which time two ballistic missile targets will be launched and tracked. MDA's STSS program director, Air Force Col. Jay Morgan, has stated that the satellites will play a role in at least two other MDA tests. These planned tests should be regarded as provisional, as MDA's formal test schedule is not yet finalized.
Northrop Grumman's STSS program manager, Gabe Watson, said the following of the MDA's addition of the two satellites to its BMD system:
We can track missiles in every stage of flight, from launch to intercept, and do hit assessment as well. If the MDA wants to intercept missiles in the ascent phase, they will need additional data that [current missile warning satellites] don't provide.
» Northrop Grumman Announcement
» Global Security Newswire Reporting
» More stories on: Space-Based Systems
This high success rate is especially impressive considering the much higher failure rates associated with India's trials of its short and medium-range ballistic missiles. The Indian government's Defense Research and Development Organization didn't publicly acknowledge the existence of a missile defense program until 2006, although at the time it was admitted that the program had been underway for quite some time. Even including these few years of secret development, India's missile defense program is progressing rapidly, with VK Saraswat—the current head of missile development at the DRDO—claiming that India's missile defense weapon testing could be complete by 2010. This speed seriously outstrips India's development of an offensive ballistic missile force.
In addition to speed, India's program shows signs of significant sophistication, especially compared to her possible regional adversaries. A case in point is China. While China's offensive ballistic missile program is more advanced than India's, it does not possess a comparable BMD capability. China's surface-to-air missiles could intercept ballistic missiles, but only up to an altitude of 30km. Furthermore, it is thought that China's BMD program falls far behind India's in the area of research and development, particularly in the area of software development and programming, key and indispensable components of any functional missile defense system.
As regional powers such as China and North Korea proceed with vigorous ballistic missile programs, it will be interesting to watch the progress of India's development of a potentially robust indigenous ballistic missile defense system.
» Missile details: Prithvi-2
Secretary Gates has also deployed the sea-based X-band radar system to the region in order to monitor any launch activity. "We are in a good position, should it become necessary, to protect Americans and American territory," he said.
» AP Reports on Japanese Suspicion of NK Missile Launch Towards Hawaii
» Missile details: Taep'o-dong 2
» Missile system details for: Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
A low-power laser was used as a simulated surrogate for the full-powered chemical laser. The tests are the first in a series, planned to culminate in a "lethal" demonstration of the system's effectiveness against a ballistic missile later in 2009.
» Boeing Reports Successful Ground-Target Test of High-Powered Laser
» Missile system details for: Airborne Laser (ABL)
The full pdf can be accessed here.
"While the situation in the world is unclear, including concerning the missile defence system, we will not touch our nuclear potential," said Makarov. The missile shield—intended as a defense and deterrent against the possibility of an Iranian missile launched at American allies in Europe—is considered "an unnecessary complication in bilateral relations" by Moscow.
The statement comes amid negotiations between U.S. and Russia about a possible successor to the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which is set to expire on December 5.
» More stories on: European Missile Defenses
This follows Japan's launch of four surveillance satellites in 1998 after North Korea's launch of a long-range missile over Japan.
Amid growing concerns about North Korean belligerence and missile technology, Japan eased its long-standing policy of pacifism last year in order to permit the use of space for military defense.
» More stories on: Japan
Russia estimates the blast to be in the 10 to 20 kiloton range—a significant advance over North Korea's 2006 nuclear test. The test took place approximately 50 miles west of Kilju, in northeast North Korea.
The South Korean defense ministry is reporting that North Korea also fired two short-range missiles the same day, and three more on Tuesday.
Despite North Korea's state news agency's references to a "nuclear deterrent for self-defence," the test—along with the missile launches on Monday and Tuesday—confirms the compelling case for a multi-layered missile defense system in the United States, whose west coast is within range of North Korean ballistic missiles.
The miniaturization technology required to affix a nuclear weapon to a ballistic missile is significantly more sophisticated than the technology required merely to detonate a nuclear bomb. North Korea may thus still be some time away from the marriage of its nuclear weapons program to its ballistic missile program.
But this most recent nuclear test, coupled with North Korea's attempted satellite launch in early April, indicate Pyongyang's determination to proceed with both the elements required for the successful production and deployment of nuclear ICBMs.
The lesson of the last 15 years is that diplomacy has failed. North Korea is happy to sign agreements to dismantle their nuclear weapons programs or refrain from testing missiles and then violate those agreements at will.
The United States is left with two options. The first option is the execution of an overwhelming and preemptive military attack to neutralize North Korea's nuclear weapon and ballistic missile programs. This solution is drastic, and it is one the United States will not undertake. The second option is the deployment of a multi-layered missile defense system at home, so as to render a nuclear-tipped North Korean ICBM impotent.
In light of the alternative and the persistent failure of the carrots and sticks of diplomacy, this second option appears self-evidently compelling. And yet President Obama's newest defense budget, although it contains modest increases in the development and deployment of theater-based missile defense to shield American troops and allies, also contains drastic cuts to our ground-based missile defenses in Alaska and California, and eliminates several more capable systems designed to engage missiles in their boost phase-precisely the defenses that we will need to confront future belligerency by North Korea.
» North Korea Conducts First Nuclear Test
» North Korea Claims Nuclear Weapons
Iran conducted a missile test today in Semnan province, 125 miles east of Tehran. The state-run Iranian news service reports that the missile is a solid-fueled Sajjil-2; if true, this would be Iran's second medium-range missile test in the last six months. According to Iran's defense minister, Mostafa Mohammad Najjar, this new and improved Sajjil is said to have more sophisticated navigation equipment and improved sensors.
Defense Secretary Gates has confirmed that the launch took place, but cannot confirm whether the missile hit its target; no further details are being released at this point.
The launch is thought to be a play in both international and domestic politics. Israel has expressed the opinion that the launch is a response to Prime Minister Netanyahu's recent visit to the White House; President Ahmadinejad's announcement of the launch while on the campaign trail suggests that he might be trying to show some strength ahead of Iranian presidential elections on June 12.
For more, please visit our News Archive…
Watch the Heritage Foundation's new film on the threat posed by long-range ballistic missiles, 33 Minutes: Protecting America in the New Missile Age. »»